& Why KJV-Only Deceivers Don’t Want You to Consult the Greek


Barbara Aho

June 23, 2023





In Bible translation there are often shades of meanings for a single word in the original language.  Translators who fail to consider the context of a Greek or Hebrew word, not only the verse but also the passage, the book, and the entire Bible, will end up with a misleading translation of the word which leads to a false interpretation of the verse.  In the King James Version, there are a number of misleading translations of end time prophecies in the book of Revelation, which have yielded a crop of false interpretations of important prophecies. Indeed whole networks of false prophecy teachers have either failed to take into account the context and shades of meaning of key Greek words, or they have intentionally misled the Church to believe false interpretations of Bible prophecy.


A very important prophecy is Revelation 13:16, the Mark of the Beast and its placement on the hand or forehead.  Greek grammar requires that the Greek word "epi" followed by an accusative ("hand" or "forehead") must be translated ON or UPON.  Because a Greek lexicon is not consulted by KJV-Only Christians, what seems like a minor difference - in vs. on - has become a major deception. The truth must be understood so that Tribulation saints will not be deceived by the counterfeit mark (microchip/vaccine) and take the real Mark. Those who take the counterfeit mark and regret it will be told they will be forgiven if they take the "Mark of God" or "Mark of Israel" -- the Six-pointed Star (Star of Remphan, Seal of Solomon), which is not the "Mark of God" but a talisman used in witchcraft to conjure demons.

“The Hexagram, in magic it is considered the most evil of all symbols used mainly with dark magic. It is one of the most potent symbols used in the working of the powers of darkness. Mainly used to work dark magic. The hexagram is thought to be the most evil and most powerful of all symbols in witchcraft and the occult, it consists of 6 sides, 6 points and 6 smaller triangles, thus 666. The hexagram is considered to be Satan's most powerful symbol. The hexagram is used mainly in witchcraft to conjure demons to the world making them appear in this dimension to do the bidding of the witch. According to former Satanist, Bill Schnoebelen, “a hexagram must be present to call forth a demon” and ” it is a very powerful tool to invoke Satan”. In fact the word hex, as “to put a hex on someone” derives from the word hexagram.”  (Symbols of Witchcraft and Paganism)

There are many other translation errors pertaining to end times prophecy in the King James Version. Young's Literal Translation is a more reliable translation of the Textus Receptus. The New King James, also based on the Textus Receptus, corrects many of the errors in the KJV.  This report will shed some light on other misleading translations of end time prophecies and the false interpretations which have developed from King James Onlyism. It is of critical importance to set the record straight since the inaccurate translation and interpretation of end time prophecies will have eternal consequences. [See: Shock & Awe in the KJV Only Camp]

The following verses in the Book of Revelation are prophecies of the beheading of the Tribulation Saints: the 1st Seal (Rev 6:1-2), 2nd Seal (Rev 6:3-4), 4th Seal (Rev 6:7-8), 5th Seal (Rev 6:9-11), and the beheaded Saints of Rev. 20:4.


The First Seal

Young's Literal Translation


“And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying, as it were a voice of thunder, `Come and behold!' and I saw, and lo, a white horse, and he who is sitting upon it is having a bow, and there was given to him a crown, and he went forth overcoming, and that he may overcome.” Rev 6:1-2

Please note there is a seriously mistaken interpretation of this prophecy based on the KJV's misleading translation of Rev. 6:2:

King James Version - "Revelation 6:2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer."

The Rider of the White Horse in the 1st Seal has a “bow” but not an arrow. The Greek word for “bow”— τοξον (toxon) —is the same Greek word found in the Greek Old Testament, the Septuagint, for God’s “rainbowin Genesis 9:13-16:

“I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.

The Rider on the White Horse does not carry a weapon, but a rainbow; therefore, he cannot be a military figure who conducts a global military campaign as the King James Version misinterprets the Greek word τοξον (toxon).


Revelation 6:1 mentions a “noise of thunder” introducing the rider on the white horse.

“And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see.” Rev. 6:1

Throughout the Bible “thunder” signifies God’s approaching judgment and, in Rev 6:1, the noise of thunder introduces the Seal judgments. Verse 2 confirms that the “bow” is a “rainbow” and not a weapon. 

“And I saw, and lo, a white horse, and he who is sitting upon it is having a bow, and there was given to him a crown, and he went forth overcoming, and that he may overcome.” Rev 6:2

 Thunder naturally precedes rain and rainbows and, in the Bible, it announces God’s judgment on the wickedness of men:

Is it not wheat harvest to day? I will call unto the LORD, and he shall send thunder and rain; that ye may perceive and see that your wickedness is great, which ye have done in the sight of the LORD, in asking you a king.” 1 Samuel 12:17

The Rider on the White Horse “will be given a crown”— perhaps as one of the 10 Kings—not the Antichrist but a counterfeit Antichrist, who will overcome all resistance by Judicial fiat, the imposition of a new system of global governance, the Seven Noahide Laws.


The Second Seal                     

Young's Literal Translation


And there went forth another horsered, and to him who is sitting upon it, there was given to him to take the peace from the land, and that one another they may slay, and there was given to him a great sword." Rev 6:3-4

Note in verse 4 that “one another they may slay” states that peace will be taken from the earth by individual people slaying one another, not by World War III as commonly taught.  Likewise, the 1st Seal Rider “overcomes” all resistance to the 7 Noahide laws, rather an “conquers” as commonly taught.

Strong's Greek Dictionary

3528. νικαω nikao
from 3529; to
subdue (literally or figuratively):—conquer, overcome, prevail, get the victory.

N.B. The Greek word for νικαω (nikao) and its usage in the New Testament means to subdue, overcome or prevail, not as a military conquest, but as a spiritual victory. For example, Luke 11:22; John 16:33; Romans 3:4, 12:21; 1John 2:13, 2:14, 4:4, 5:4, 5:5; Revelation 2:7, 11, 2:17, 3:5, 3:12, 3:21, 5:5, 11:7, 12:11, 13:7, 15:2, 17:14, 21:7.


How will the Rider of the Red Horse overcome all resistance to global governance if not by military conquest?




   The Rider on the Pale Horse will kill/behead with the Sword:

And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.  And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth." Rev 6:7-8


We, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the last moment before quantum transformation. The destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body.” Barbara Marx Hubbard

The Noahide Laws require that all Christians be decapitated. We may infer from statements such as those made by Barbara Marx Hubbard that, at the start of the Tribulation periodthe 4th Sealthose who worship Jesus Christ will be beheaded with the sword:

People who do not accept the New Age teaching...are an evolutionary drag on humanity and must capitulate or be killed.166 (19:186)

Christ-consciousness and Christ-abilities are the natural inheritance of every human being on Earth. When the word of this hope has reached the nations...(a)ll will know their choice. All will be required to choose. There will be mighty dislocations and magnificent relocations. All who choose not to evolve will die off.” - 165.17

We, the elders have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. Something must be done before the whole body is destroyed. Were in charge of God's selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse 'Death, We come to bring death to those who are unable to know God. (The Revelation: Our Crisis is a Birth, 1993) 80

The Fifth Seal


The 5th Seal reveals the manner in which “they may slay one another”—

And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held. And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth? And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled." Rev 6:9-11

Note that Rev. 6:11 states that the martyrs were told to wait until “their fellowservants also and their brethren…should be killed as they were.” Their fellowservants and brethren will be “beheaded” later in the Tribulation and all will be beheaded “for the Word of God and the witness/testimony of Jesus” which they held. Therefore, the first group of martyrs will be beheaded (“killed as they were”) in the same manner as the saints in Rev. 20:4.


Beheaded with Axes

"And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or on their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years." Rev 20:4

The Greek word for “beheaded” is “pelekizo” which means “to chop off (the head) with an axe.” According to the Greek-English Interlinear and Strong's Concordance, pelekizo is actually derived from the Greek word for “axe”!

 Revelation 20:4 And kai I saw eidw thrones qronoV, and kai they sat kaqizw upon epi them autoV, and kai judgment krima was given didwmi unto them autoV: and kai I saw the souls yuch of them that were beheaded pelekizw for dia the witness marturia of Jesus IhsouV, and kai for dia the word logoV of God qeoV, and kai which ostiV had proskunew not ou worshipped proskunew the beast qhrion, neither oute his autoV image eikwn, kai neither ou had received lambanw his mark caragma upon epi their autoV foreheads metwpon, or kai on epi their autoV hands ceir; and kai they lived zaw and kai reigned basileuw with meta Christ CristoV a thousand cilioi years etoV

Strong's Greek Dictionary

3990. πελεκιζω pelekizo
from a derivative of 4141 (meaning an axe); to chop off (the head), i.e. truncate:—behead




The Rider on the White Horse (1st Seal) is the logo of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which is similar to the logo of the Order of the Knights of the Temple of Solomon (Knights Templar) who were the predecessors of the Orders of Freemasonry.






The following rituals are described in Morals & Dogma, "Albert Pikes' 861 page volume of 'lectures' on the esoteric roots of Freemasonry, specifically the 32-degree Scottish Rite...Morals and Dogma is a huge, rambling treasure-house of esoteric data, particularly on the Kabalah and ancient Mystery religions." According to Morals & Dogma, the Knights Templar degrees of Freemasonry begin with the 28th degree and end with the 33rd degree. Between the Chapter of the Rose Croix (15-18) and the Knights Templar degrees (28-33) are XXI. Noachite, or Prussian Knight and XXII. Knight of the Royal Axe, or Prince of Libanus. The latter is of interest since the mode of execution of worshippers of Jesus Christ is beheading with an axe or sword.




The object held in view in the degree of Knight of the Royal Axe, is to teach all men that labor is honorable, and that we should strive to improve the condition of the toiling millions. We are all workmen in our several vocations, whether in actual labor, preparing plans for the laborers, or studying the calculations of Philosophy, the advancement of civilization, the destruction of ignorance and barbarism. / Freemasonry considers Christianity to be ignorant and barbaric.







Bodies of this degree are styled Colleges.  There are two apartments. The first is a plain room, of moderate dimensions, without any fixed number of lights, and prepared to represent a workshop on Mount Lebanon. The second is hung with red and lighted by 36 lights, arranged by sixes, and each six by twos. It represents the Council-room of the Round Table. In the centre of the room is such a table, around which the brethren sit. The altar is in the East, and upon it are an open [KJV] Bible, the square and Compasses and an Axe.


The officers are a Chief Prince, who is styled "Thrice Puissant," a Senior and a Junior Grand Warden, a Master of Ceremonies, and a Captain of the Guard.


The order is a broad, rainbow-colored ribbon, worn as a collar. It may be worn as a sash, from right to left, and is lined with purple. The jewel, suspended to the collar, is a axe and handle of gold. On the top of end of the handle are the letters and; on one side of the handle,  and on the other ; on one side of the blade.



The letters on the top are the initials of the names of Noah and Solomon; those on the handle, of Libanus and Tsidun; those on one side of the blade, of Adoniram, Cyrus, Darius, Zerubbabel, Nehemiah, and Ezra; and those on the other side, of Shem, Kham, Yapheth, Moses, Ahaliab, and Betselal.


The apron is white, lined and bordered with purple. On the middle a round table is embroidered, on which are mathematical instrument, and plans unrolled. On the flap is a serpent with three heads.


The tracing board is a view of the mountains and forests of Lebanon, the summit of the mountain covered with snow; [Mount Hermon] and of the Temple erected of its cedars and pines. It is in the form of an axe.

Mount Hermon/Sion in northern Israel was the point of entry of the fallen angels (Genesis 6). The apostate tribe of Dan relocated from their territory on the coast to Mount Hermon/Sion where they intermarried with the Canaanite Tuatha de Danaan. ("Mount Sion" is Mount Hermon located at the 33rd degree of the Paris Zero Meridian and not Mount Zion in Jerusalem. "...Mount Sion which is Hermon." Deut. 4:48) The KJV mistranslates Zion as Sion which will validate the pagan temple of the Antichrist at Mount Hermon/Sion.  After the Assyrian invasion, the tribe of Dan migrated to Greece and ultimately to the British Isles.  Scottish Rite Freemasonry is an offshoot of the tribe of Dan. [See: The British Druids; The Lost Tribe of Dan]

Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, a pioneer of Reform Judaism in America, stated in 1855: Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.(See: Heeding Bible Prophecy: New Israel)

The Jewish Tribune stated in 1927, “Freemasonry is based on Judaism. Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the Masonic ritual and what is left?”

Freemasonry was a creation of the apostate tribe of Dan, which conspires to usurp the Messianic birthright of the tribe of Judah and replace the worship of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, with worship of their False Messiah. All Masonic rituals inculcate members with admiration for the Jews as God's Chosen People and loathing of Christianity as ignorant, barbaric and intolerant. The Knight of the Sword and Rose Croix is a military order armed with the Great Sword of the 2nd Seal / Rev 6:4.

Chapter of Rose Croix

XV. Knight of the East or of the Sword

[Knight of the East, of the Sword, or of the Eagle.]

THIS Degree, like all others in Masonry, is symbolical. Based upon historical truth and authentic tradition, it is still an allegory. leading lesson of this Degree is Fidelity to obligation, and Constancy and Perseverance under difficulties and discouragement.

Masonry is engaged in her crusade, against ignorance, intolerance, fanaticism, superstition, uncharitableness, and error. She does not sail with the trade-winds, upon a smooth sea, with a steady free breeze, fair for a welcoming harbor; but meets and must overcome many opposing currents, baffling winds, and dead calms.




This degree is called Knight of the Sword, sometimes Knight of the East or Knight Mason of Rose-Croix since the reception is a fully military one. It is founded on sacred history in that once the Jews were led to Babylon in captivity and the temple destroyed,...




Sovereign: My Brethren, help me to open the lodge of knight of the sword...

Jr. General: Sovereign Master, the lodge is duly tiled and all brethren present are knights of the sword.

Sovereign Sr. General What times are we in ?

Sr. General: The day [when] the seventy years of captivity are finished.

Sovereign: Generals, princes, knights, a long time ago I resolved to set free the captive Jews. I am tired to see them moan in chains ; but I cannot release them without consulting you about a dream I had last night and which requires an explanation.

I thought I saw a roaring lion ready to pounce and devour me. His aspect frightened me and caused me to flee and seek safety from his anger; but at that instant, in a dazzling light bursting from the opened heavens, I saw my predecessors represented as the last step of the altar to the glory that Masons designate under the name of grand architect of the universe. Two words were heard ; they came out from the center of the shining star: I understood they meant to set the captives free unless my crown would pass into foreign hands; I remained dumbfounded and confused; the dream disappeared. Since that moment, my tranquility is gone. It is your task, princes, to deliberate and give me your opinion on what I must do.


During that speech, all the brethren have lowered their heads but finally they look at the senior general, doing as he does. The senior general places his right hand on his sword, draws it, and holds the point high, his arm held in front of him,  then he points the sword downward to signify agreement with the king’s will, then points the sword upward again to signify freedom, and remains in this position.


Sovereign: Let the captivity be ended: generals, princes, knights, the lodge of knights of the sword is open.


The generals repeat the phrase, each on his own side. The Sovereign and all the brethren make the usual acclamations, but without applauding.

Based on the symbols of the CFR and Freemasonry and the 21st and 22nd degrees of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, we may venture a guess that the 1st, 2nd and 4th Seal judgments will be under the direction of Templars and high level Freemasons (Noachite, Knights of the Royal Axe and Knights of the Sword) in the Council on Foreign Relations.


The Rainbow is the logo of the New Age Movement, LGBTQ, Freemasonry and the Noahide Laws. All of these movements are conspiring and will unite to enforce the Noahide Laws on mankind. (Rainbow Girls is a club for daughters of Freemasons.)




American Pharaoh: The Rider on the White Horse



Indoor axe throwing ranges have mysteriously sprung up in every state and many cities of the US, and in every country all around the world!  There are 600 axe throwing ranges in the US alone, generally marketed as friendly places where people bond together, let out their frustrations and have a good time.

"Commercial axe-throwing arenas only started in Europe around 2016. Hotbeds of the axe-throwing event in Europe are the UK and Poland. Gradually, axe-throwing bars have opened up in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and even Thailand. These offer a unique leisure activity one can perform with friends or even family. Various new axe-throwing companies have cropped up in these countries to cater to the growing interest. An axe throwing company provides arenas to practice axe throwing for a fee." (Axe Throwing: More Than Simply A Game)

Axe throwing ranges appear to be franchises, having the same layout, bars that sell alcohol, and coaches who train people as young as 8 years old how to throw axes at targets aiming for the bull’s eye. The targets even have "kill shots" which sounds ominous.  Axe throwing ranges also have mobile units which travel to schools and there are axe throwing leagues even for young people. Axe throwing competitions are held nationally and internationally.

Some facilities have Rage Rooms for relieving stress by smashing glass objects, electronics, etc. In Ontario, Canada, adjoining the Axe throwing facility, “The Rage Room is somewhere you can let out all your frustrations over COVID, work, divorce, you name it,” says manager Amanda Vega." In Baltimore, Maryland, "Many embrace axe throwing to vent or relieve stress. One group, celebrating a divorce party, hung a marriage license on the target." 

Now You Can Throw an Ax at (a Picture of) Your Ex
Washingtonian› 2018 January 16


"Since opening in November, Bad Axe Throwing in Northeast has hosted everything from birthday to bachelorette parties to business meetings with catered lunch and a projector. Also popular? Divorce parties,... Ax-throwing divorce parties are a thing. If your bitter heart so desires, you can even bring a picture of your ex to use as a target. Or perhaps something more sartorial. “We had one lady who came in and she actually brought her wedding dress,” which they let her use as the target, says St-Amour. One guy sunk an ax into his ex-wife’s high heels."



What are they training for? 

"And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, Come and see. And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword." Rev 6:3-4

"And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or on their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years." Rev 20:4

The penalty for breaking even one Noahide Law is decapitation, and the first 2 Noahide laws will be violated by all who worship Jesus Christ. Talmudic Jews believe that Jesus is a Christian idol; therefore, to worship Him is idolatry and to speak the name of Jesus is blaspheming the name of God.

Basing their views on the passage in Gen. ii. 16, they declared that the following six commandments were enjoined upon Adam: (1) not to worship idols; (2) not to blaspheme the name of God; (3) to establish courts of justice; (4) not to kill; (5) not to commit adultery; and (6) not to rob (Gen. R. xvi. 9, xxiv. 5; Cant. R. i. 16; comp. Seder ‘Olam Rabbah, ed. Ratner, ch. v. and notes, Wilna, 1897; Maimonides, ‘Yad,’ Melakim, ix. 1). A seventh commandment was added after the Flood—not to eat flesh that had been cut from a living animal (Gen. ix. 4). Thus, the Talmud frequently speaks of ‘the seven laws of the sons of Noah,’ which were regarded as obligatory upon all mankind, in contradistinction to those that were binding upon Israelites only (Tosef., ‘Ab. Zarah, ix. 4; Sanh. 56a et seq.)

The Jewish Encyclopedia states that the penalty for Gentiles who violate even one of the 7 Noahide Laws is death by decapitation. Note the disparity. Due process is not required in the criminal prosecution of a Noachid / Gentile and the death penalty does not apply to Jews,

In the elaboration of these seven Noachian laws, and in assigning punishments for their transgression, the Rabbis are sometimes more lenient and sometimes more rigorous with Noachidæ than with Israelites. With but a few exceptions, the punishment meted out to a Noachid for the transgression of any of the seven laws is decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see Capital Punishment). The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachid. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning (‘hatra’ah’) from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (ib. 57a, b; ‘Yad,’ l.c. ix. 14). With regard to idolatry, he can be found guilty only if he worshiped an idol in the regular form in which that particular deity is usually worshiped; while in the case of blasphemy he may be found guilty, even when he has blasphemed with one of the attributes of God’s name—an action which, if committed by an Israelite, would not be regarded as criminal (ib. 56b; see Blasphemy).


The Noachidæ are required to establish courts of justice in every city and province; and these courts are to judge the people with regard to the six laws and to warn them against the transgression of any of them (ib.; ‘Yad,’ l.c. ix. 14, x. 11; comp. Naḥmanides on Gen. xxxiv. 13, where the opinion is expressed that these courts should judge also cases other than those coming under the head of the six laws, as, for example, larceny, assault and battery, etc.). In the case of murder, if the Noachid slay a child in its mother’s womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of (‘ṭerefah’), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or by putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self-defense, the Noachid is guilty of murder and must pay the death-penalty, although under the same circumstances an Israelite would not be executed (ib. 57b; ‘Yad,’ l.c. ix. 4; comp. ‘Kesef Mishneh,’ ad loc.).

If you cannot fathom how a mass murder of Christians could happen in the United States of America, watch the following video of one Christian’s “End Times Dream” of church members killing Christians in their church. We don’t normally trust dreams as reliable sources of Bible interpretation, but this dream confirms all of the verses cited above.



The Christian woman, Tina Golik, avoids giving too many details because YouTube censors exposure of the Jewish conspiracy.  She seems to believe that those who were beheading Christians in her dream were Muslims. However, in 1991, the Talmudic Noahide Laws were made US Public Law 102-14 by President George Bush. These draconian laws were secretly passed by Congress and they have been endorsed by every US president since then.


Matthew 24:10-12 may be a prophecy of Revelation 6:4 wherein false professors in the churches behead those who worship Jesus:

"Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.  And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.  And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.  And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold." Mt 24:10-13


"And there went forth another horse--red, and to him who is sitting upon it, there was given to him to take the peace from the land, and that one another they may slay, and there was given to him a great sword."





"And there went forth another horse--red...that one another they may slay"


You may be wondering....“what about the Constitution??!!!”


American Christians are hard pressed to imagine how the 7 Talmudic Noahide laws could be enforced in the United States which has been a Constitutional Republic for 247 years.  What would it take to change the "Law of the Land"The U.S. Constitution? 


Since 2013 there has been a well-organized Convention of States movement whose agenda is to require Congress to hold a second Constitutional Convention. 

"Article V of the U.S. Constitution gives states the power to call a convention to propose amendments. It takes 34 states to call the convention and 38 to ratify any amendments that are proposed. Our convention would only allow the states to discuss amendments that, “limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and place term limits on federal officials.”


Article V :


"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate."


"Since Convention of States launched in 2013, we’ve been spreading like wildfire. With millions of supporters nationwide, we have petition signers in every single state house district across America. We’re actively working in all fifty states to pass the Convention of States Resolution!"

The latest statistics show 19 of the required 34 states to force Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. In 7 states, one chamber has passed the COS Resolution and 16 states have active legislation this year.

Congress Introduces Resolution Calling for Article V Constitutional Convention


"Chairman of the U.S. House Budget Committee Representative Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) is pushing a resolution that, if passed, would open the entire U.S. Constitution for revision. On March 14, 2023, Representative Arrington introduced H.Con.Res. 24 calling for a federal Constitutional Convention to propose a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution. “As provided in Article V of the Constitution of the United States…"

Assurances have been made that "Our convention would only allow the states to discuss amendments that, ‘limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and place term limits on federal officials’.” What would the Founding Fathers say?

1788 Fears of a Second Constitutional Convention


"Nationalists, such as James Madison and George Washington, were wary of calls from state ratifying conventions for a second national constitutional convention. They feared that a new convention would result in changes to the Constitution that would weaken a federal government or, worse, create a deadlock that would make establishing the federal government impossible. Ultimately, Madison and Washington endorsed mild constitutional amendments as a way of avoiding structural changes to the federal government."

Who’s Who in the COs for a 2nd CON CON?


The Convention of States and Constitutional Convention are passionately promoted by Zionist Jews posturing as conservatives, which deceives many Christians. Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, David Rubin, Jordan Peterson, Mark Meckler, to name just a few.  Some Jewish agents openly promote the Noahide Laws.



The Zionist Bible: The Babylonian Talmud presents a radically different picture of Talmudic Judaismlike a pack of ravening wolves salivating at the prospect of slaughtering God's Christian sheepfold en masse.  True Torah Rabbis rightly identify Zionists as Godless, Criminal and Satanic.


Rebel Rabbis: Anti-Zionist Jews Against Israel

"Satmar, the largest Hasidic sect in the world stated, 'We feel very strongly that there should not be and could not be a State of Israel before the Messiah comes.' According to Satmar Rebbe Teitelbaum, 'We'll continue to fight God's war against Zionism.'"

Convention of States, Leadership Summit 2022, 'Reclaiming Liberty' Summit Videos from Orlando, Florida

Mark Levin was interviewed by Mark Meckler, Founder of COS, who asked him to explain conservative charges of ultra liberal funding. Around 1:20 minutes Levin was confronted with the fact that the COS is funded by George Soros. Levin dodged the issue by claiming that the people who object just don't care about the country.  The same people who object to Soros funding a conservative COS are saying there will be a "runaway convention." 

Major Takeaways of the COS Leadership Summit :

52:28 "God is behind COS movement"

 1:00 To COS members: "God is on your side"

 1:30 Mark Levin works for far Left Cumulus Radio

 1:20 COS funded by GEORGE SOROS

 1:22 State legislatures have more power over Constitution than Congress

 1:22:40 Change one Amendment of the Constitution by having a Constitutional Convention

Former Senator Rick Santorum, a Knight of Malta, was a speaker at the 2022 Convention of States Leadership Summit. He stated that so far 19 states have voted for a Convention of States and that he is on a mission to promote a COS in all of the red state legislatures. He believes that with the upcoming elections the required number of 34 states can be achieved and a COS held in the next year or two. 

George Soros is a supporter of progressive and liberal political causes, to which he dispenses donations through his foundation, the Open Society FoundationsLeftist Soros funds conservative causes and Mark Levin promotes them so they can control and defeat the opposition.

"The Mark Levin Show is a conservative talk radio show hosted by Mark Levin. The program is broadcast nationwide on Westwood One owned by Cumulus radio. Mark Levin: Cumulus has a far left Board of Directors and yet sponsors many conservative programs."


Convention of States Tell Us They Aren’t Pushing a Con-Con – But That’s What the COS Founder Called It in 2011


Now, [Mark] Meckler claims to be a conservative, yet he heads up the first video on a site called Living Room Conversations. What’s so interesting about that is that Meckler believes that we need to join with people like Van Jones…. Yes, Communist Van Jones, who is also a part of Living Room ConversationsJust take a look at their lineup here. Yet, you, conservatives, and more importantly Christians, are to believe what these people tell you who integrate with some of America’s enemies. Van Jones was released by the Obama administration because of his communism being exposed for goodness sakes!...


Consider that Living Room conversations employees the Delphi technique in order to build consensus. To say that we need to work with people like Van Jones over what the law of the land is like me needing to have a conversation with the devil as to how I’m to follow Christ.


Marxist dictator, Vladimir Lenin, revealed the dialectical tactic of the Jews – to control both right and left – which worked well to defeat the opponents of Communism:


“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”



Globalist Co-founder of COS and Founder of a Left-leaning CIA-Affiliated Christian college dedicated to a 2nd Constitutional Convention

MICHAEL FARRIS Co-Founder of COS, Founder of HSLDA, Founder/President of Patrick Henry College, President/CEO of Alliance Defense Fund/Alliance Defending Freedom


The Alliance Defending Freedom was originally the Alliance Defense Fund, but the name was changed in 2012. The Alliance Defense Fund was started by Council for National Policy members, Alan Sears, James Dobson, Larry Burkett, Bill Bright and D. James Kennedy. The current President/CEO is Michael Farris, also CNP. The ADF has now branched into ADF International, with headquarters in Vienna, Austria and works with the global network of Leftist human rights orgs: the United Nations, Organization of American States, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, European Court of Human Rights, European Union and the Fundamental Rights Agency.  ADF International is “accredited by the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).” The Alliance Defending Freedom is an NGO of the United Nations.

Council for National Policy 2014 Membership Roster

CNP 1997-1998 Membership Roster

Patrick Henry College


Students in the school’s Strategic Intelligence Program can graduate with security clearances from their summer internships, making PHC a feeder school for the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency, various branches of the military, and intelligence contractors. Many students go there with dreams of becoming a senator or the Supreme Court justice who helps overturn Roe v. Wade. A prospective student pamphlet quotes George W. Bush, saying, “The College holds a vision for the future of America.” / True, America under Talmudic Noahide Laws

Patrick Henry College Welcomes Marxists such as Obama Staffer, Michael Wear, to Speak on Campus. Wear was a White House Staffer during Obama's first term; he served in the White House faith-based initiative where he led evangelical outreach.



Example: Patrick Henry College has welcomed “& Campaign” Justin Giboney and Michael Wear


Come Hear National Leaders: Newsmakers Interview Series 2019  


Patrick Henry College (PHC) Newsmakers Interview Series with Marvin Olasky 

Michael Wear                             


Dr. Marvin Olasky, Editor-in-Chief of WORLD Magazine is back for another week of "Newsmakers" interviews! This April, he will be interviewing 11 national leaders covering topics of political strategy, public policy, religious liberty, criminal justice reform, gender identity, and philanthropy. 


Marvin Olasky is former Editor in Chief of World Magazine and Dean of the World Journalism Institute. Olasky was a former member of the Communist Party who converted to Calvinist Reconstructionism.

1. Justin Giboney: The “And Campaign” for Redemptive Justice

“Atlanta attorney and political strategist. Co-chair of Obama for America’s Gen-44-Atlanta Initiative

Patrick Henry College Newsmakers | Michael Wear

“Michael Wear is the founder of Public Square Strategies LLC, and a leading expert and strategist at the intersection of faith, politics and American public life. Michael was one of the youngest White House staffers in modern American history: he served in the White House faith-based initiative during President Obama’s first term, where he led evangelical outreach and helped manage trafficking efforts. Michael’s book, Reclaiming Hope: Lessons Learned in the Obama White House gives an unvarnished account of faith inside the world’s most powerful office, and an unprecedented insight into the most controversial stories of the last eight years. He serves on the national board of Bethany Christian Services, the nation’s largest adoption agency, and holds an honorary position at the University of Birmingham’s Cadbury Center for the Public Understanding of Religion.”


What could possibly go wrong...

     With a bipartisan cabal of Marxist Talmudic Jews conspiring to pull off a Constitutional Convention??




Many conservatives fear that a Runaway convention could be in the making and it is within the realm of probability that a majority of Talmudic Jewish delegates are already strategizing to abolish US Constitution and replace it with the Noahide Laws. Preparing the citizenry to accept Talmudic law are a plethora of books by Jewish authors who bewail the abandonment of Constitutional law and argue for its replacement with Talmudic Law. One such example is Elliot Axelman's book Presumed Guilty: How DC politicians destroyed due process - and how we can restore it. Axleman recommends "Jewish law" as the solution to the injustices perpetrated by Congress and conflates the Talmud and Torah as equally supporting "due process":

"Jewish law supports due process and the presumption of innocence, as well. explains: “Many parts of the Torah, Talmud, and the codes of law that followed described due process procedures to ensure fair trials. Anyone accused of a crime had the right of bail except in death-penalty cases. Traditional Jewish courts had no trained lawyers arguing cases. The prosecutor was either the victim himself or, if he had been killed, a relative (“blood-avenger”) commandment forbidding one to “bear false witness” faced the same penalty that the accused would have suffered. The accused had an absolute right against self-incrimination and was not permitted to make statements harmful to himself. Likewise, confessions were not admissible evidence in court. There was no jury. The judges deliberated with the accused looking on. The youngest judge spoke his opinion first in order to avoid being influenced by the senior judges. The judges then decided the verdict by majority vote.”

Axelman, Elliot "Alu," Presumed Guilty, p. 9, The Liberty Block.


For the truth about the Talmud, read The Zionist's Bible: The Babylonian Talmud and/or The Talmud Unmasked

Elliot Axelman has written another book, The Blueprint for Liberty: The comprehensive plan to save us from civil war and keep our nation peaceful and free. Blueprint for Liberty advocates for the secession of states from the Union so they can govern themselves.

"'I am sorry to inform you that the country that you once knew and loved is irredeemably broken,' says author Elliot Axelman. In his latest book, he tells the reader that 'personal freedom is paramount,' and becoming independent is the only way to restore freedom, civility, and peace...

"Axelman structures a precise case for secession for every state in the U.S... Axelman does a praiseworthy job of constructing his case. Furthermore, more than a few times in the book, every American should sit back and question what they previously believed about the state of the United States.

"Axelman does a remarkable job of emphasizing the philosophical and cultural disparities between the left and the right in America. He argues that resolution of the differences may not be possible. When this resolution is unattainable, Axelman says secession may be the only way. He goes so far as to offer a new Constitution."

Would Axelman's Blueprint for Liberty be a "divide and conquer" strategy for the Talmudic takeover of America?  There is a hint of the first and second Noahide Laws in Chapter 7: "Freedom of speech, assembly, & worship"

"What would God say if you told him that you will not worship him as he commanded because a politician or a judge ‘ruled’ that it’s illegal to do so? Do you serve God or do you serve the government? Do you remember God’s first commandment? I’ll give you a hint: It does not allow you to worship your government over your God." (p.47)

Contrary to Axelman's claims about the Talmud, according to the Noahide Laws, the G-d of the Talmud does not permit Christians to worship him as Jesus Christ, which would be idolatry and blasphemy.

"With regard to idolatry, he can be found guilty only if he worshiped an idol in the regular form in which that particular deity is usually worshiped; while in the case of blasphemy he may be found guilty, even when he has blasphemed with one of the attributes of God's name—an action which, if committed by an Israelite, would not be regarded as criminal (ib. 56b; see Blasphemy)." (Jewish Encyclopedia)

Blueprint for Liberty or End of Freedom of Religion?

   "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." 1st Amendment

Christian Reconstructionist Gary North favors the institution of “a Christian theocracy under Old Testament law as the best form of government, and a radically libertarian one... North has written: “I certainly believe in biblical theocracy.”  However, in his essay The Judeo-Christian Tradition: A Guide for the Perplexed, Dr. North decried Talmudic Judaism’s war on the Old Testament and rejected the Talmud as "contending with God's writ" by offering false interpretations.

“Orthodox Judaism is at war with the Old Testament. This is the primary thesis of this essay. But, unlike Reform Judaism, which is infected with the same biblical higher criticism that has undermined mainstream Christianity, Orthodox Judaism claims to accept the Old Testament as the inspired Word of God. How, then, can anyone rightfully say that Orthodox Judaism is at war with the Old Testament? Only by accepting Jesus’ words literally:


“I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only? Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? John 5:43-47).


"The thesis of this book is simple: the Jews of Jesus’ day, like their spiritual heirs, did not believe Moses’ writings….


“Here is how Weiss describes the effective use of the Talmud: “With one hand you acknowledge God’s existence. At the same time, you want to have some maneuverability. Studying critically is contending with God’s writ—acknowledging it but using criticism to alter it. Man is powerless vis-a-vis God and powerful vis-a-vis His Torah. There he can assert his independence by offering an interpretation different from the one God intended.”




Statements by former Supreme Court justices and many articles warn that a Constitutional Convention could not be controlled and may be hijacked by forces that want to destroy the United States.  (Google: "Dangers of a Constitutional Convention")  The following excerpts are from a few of these very informative sources:


   The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


       States Likely Could Not Control Constitutional Convention on Balanced Budget Amendment or Other Issues

A number of prominent jurists and legal scholars have warned that a constitutional convention could open up the Constitution to radical and harmful changes.  For instance, the late Justice Antonin Scalia said in 2014, “I certainly would not want a constitutional convention.  Whoa! Who knows what would come out of it?”

 Similarly, former Chief Justice of the United States Warren Burger wrote in 1988:


[T]here is no way to effectively limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention.  The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda.  Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey.  After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the Convention if we don’t like its agenda.[3]


Such serious concerns are justified, for several reasons:

  • A convention could write its own rules.  The Constitution provides no guidance whatsoever on the ground rules for a convention.  This leaves wide open to political considerations and pressures such fundamental questions as how the delegates would be chosen, how many delegates each state would have, and whether a supermajority vote would be required to approve amendments.  To illustrate the importance of these issues, consider that if every state had one vote in the convention and the convention could approve amendments with a simple majority vote, the 26 least populous states — which contain less than 18 percent of the nation’s people — could approve an amendment for ratification.

  • A convention could set its own agenda, possibly influenced by powerful interest groups.  The only constitutional convention in U.S. history, in 1787, went far beyond its mandate.  Charged with amending the Articles of Confederation to promote trade among the states, the convention instead wrote an entirely new governing document.  A convention held today could set its own agenda, too.  There is no guarantee that a convention could be limited to a particular set of issues, such as those related to balancing the federal budget.

As a result, powerful, well-funded interest groups would surely seek to influence the process and press for changes to the agenda, seeing a constitutional convention as an opportunity to enact major policy changes.  As former Chief Justice Burger wrote, a “Constitutional Convention today would be a free-for-all for special interest groups.”  Further, the broad language contained in many of the resolutions that states have passed recently might increase the likelihood of a convention enacting changes that are far more sweeping than many legislators supporting these resolutions envision.

  • A convention could choose a new ratification process.  The 1787 convention ignored the ratification process under which it was established and created a new process, lowering the number of states needed to approve the new Constitution and removing Congress from the approval process.  The states then ignored the pre-existing ratification procedures and adopted the Constitution under the new ratification procedures that the convention proposed.  Given these facts, it would be unwise to assume that ratification of the convention’s pro­posals would necessarily require the approval of 38 states, as the Constitution currently specifies.  For example, a convention might remove the states from the approval process entirely and pro­pose a national referendum instead.  Or it could follow the example of the 1787 convention and lower the required fraction of the states needed to approve its proposals from three-quarters to two-thirds.

  • No other body, including the courts, has clear authority over a convention.  The Constitution provides for no authority above that of a constitutional convention, so it is not clear that the courts — or any other institution — could intervene if a convention did not limit itself to the language of the state resolutions calling for a convention.

Article V contains no restrictions on the scope of constitutional amendments (other than those denying states equal representation in the Senate), and the courts generally leave such “political questions” to the elected branches.  Moreover, delegates to the 1787 convention ignored their state legislatures’ instructions.  Thus, the courts likely would not intervene in a dispute between a state and a delegate and, if they did, they likely would not back state efforts to constrain delegates given that delegates to the 1787 convention ignored their state legislatures’ instructions.

The New American


While pro-Article V convention enthusiasts tell us that this is a great time for an Article V convention because the Republican Party controls 26 of the 50 state legislatures (the Democrats control 18, five are split, and one is non-partisan), and therefore could surely block the ratification of any harmful amendments proposed by an Article V convention, they are omitting from this analysis that very many of the Republican state legislators are not constitutionalists, and could end up in alliance with Democrats to ratify some harmful amendments. Not to mention the likelihood that constitutionalists would be in the minority at the convention for proposing amendments itself.

Levin is proposing an Article V constitutional convention, or as he prefers to call it, “a convention for proposing amendments” or “the state convention process,” as a means to an end. What is his goal? As his book’s subtitle proclaims, his goal is “restoring the American Republic.” Then, on page 6 Levin states: “It is time to return to self-government, where the people are sovereign and not subjects and can reclaim some control over their future rather than accept as inevitable a dismal fate.”


Stopping a Dangerous Article V Convention

Wealthy donors, corporations, and radical far-right actors are pushing calls for an Article V Convention in states across the country to reshape our Constitution for their own benefit.


Frighteningly, they are just a few states away from succeeding.


Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, Congress is required to hold a constitutional convention if two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states) call for one.


But here’s the catch: there are absolutely no rules for an Article V Convention outlined in the Constitution.


That means the group of people convening to rewrite our Constitution could be totally unelected and unaccountable. There is nothing that could limit the convention to a single issue, so the delegates could write amendments that revoke any of our most cherished rights – like our right to peaceful protest, our freedom of religion, or our right to privacy. There are also no rules preventing corporations from pouring money into the convention to ensure they get their way.


In short, an Article V Convention would be a disaster. It would lead to long and costly legal battles, uncertainty about how our democracy functions, and likely economic instability.


But extremists and wealthy special interests see it as their best chance to write their far-right agenda into the Constitution. That is why they are working around the clock to convince their allies in state legislatures to make it happen.


Aggregation strategy


Right now, there are four major campaigns for an Article V Convention: the Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) campaign, the Convention of States (COS) campaign, the Wolf-PAC campaign, and the term limits campaign. Each has different goals, but together, they have convinced 28 states to call for a convention. That means they have just six states to go.


“Danger lies ahead. Setting aside the long odds, if California and 33 more states invoke Article V, there’s a risk that we’d end up with a ‘runaway’ convention, during which delegates would propose amendments on issues including abortion, gun rights, and immigration.”


- Rick Hasen, Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine


Constitutional Chaos The Shadow Campaigns Aiming to Unravel Our Freedom


A well-funded, highly coordinated national effort is underway to call a constitutional convention, under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, for the first time in history. The result of such a convention could be a complete overhaul of the Constitution and supporters of the convention are dangerously close to succeeding. With special interest groups gaining more momentum, conservative advocates are just six states short of reaching the constitutionally required 34-state goal.


This memo that outlines the different campaigns calling for an Article V convention and why it is just a dangerous idea. These calls for a constitutional convention represent the most serious threat to our democracy flying almost completely under the radar.


With the help and endorsement of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a corporate lobbying group masquerading as a charity, the Article V BBA campaign has gained steam in the last decade. Most convention proponents now agree that 28 states have “live” calls for a BBA convention (i.e., where the state has not passed a rescission to nullify an earlier call); that means they are just six states shy of the constitutionally required 34 applications.


The Article V BBA campaign is primarily targeting three GOP-controlled state legislatures that do not have an Article V BBA application on the books: Kentucky, Idaho, and Montana. Those continue to be the main targets each legislative session. In March 2019, former Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker became the National Honorary Chair of the Center for State-led National Debt Solutions, one of the main groups advocating for the BBA convention applications in the states. Walker, ALEC, and other BBA advocates have also announced a plan to force a convention by adding applications from the states have BBA applications together with six states with plenary convention applications.


Due to the threat of an Article V convention, several state legislatures have rescinded their Article V BBA convention applications, including Delaware (2016), New Mexico (2017), Maryland (2017), Nevada (2017), and Colorado (2021). Had those five states not rescinded their applications, BBA convention proponents would be at 33 states, just one away from reaching the 34-state goal…



Jesus warned his disciples to "be not deceived" and in Rev. 2:9 and 3:9 He identified Talmudic Judaism as the "Synagogue of Satan."

"I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." (Rev 2:9)


"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." (Rev 3:9)

Jesus' phrase "the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie" does not refer to all Jews but seems to be a reference to The Lost Tribe of Dan which is attempting to usurp the messianic birthright of the tribe of Judah. Evidence of God's judgment on this apostate tribe is discernible in Revelation 7, the absence of the tribe of Dan in God's sealing of the 144,000 of the tribes of Israel. 


The Synagogue of Satan has for decades been infiltrating and pastoring Christian churches, leading parachurch organizations, teaching in Christian education, authoring Christian books, speaking on Christian radio and performing in other falsely so-called Christian media. In short, the Synagogue of Satan has taken over the visible Church. They do not disclose that they are Jewish but operate under cover, as crypto-Jews, preaching false doctrines and false interpretations of Bible prophecy to deceive the Elect during the Tribulation period. Which is why Christians must prove all things, including their translations of the Bible according to the Greek and Hebrew, if they wish to understand Bible prophecy. Consider the pastor of your own church; does he promote the State of Israel as legitimate or does he preach that the Jews have no right to the land until Jesus Christ returns.  Jesus stated this fact in prophecies of His second coming.

"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord." Mt 23:37-39


"Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee. For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle. And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south. And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD my God shall come, and all the saints with thee." Zech. 14:1-5

"Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready. And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints. And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God. And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God." Rev 19:11-15


It is most important to evaluate your church pastor or your favorite preacher. Is he a serious student of God's Word?  What does he preach about the Mark of the Beast?  Does it agree with the Greek text?  Is it a brand or tattoo ON the hand/forehead, or a counterfeit, the computer chip/vaccine IN the hand? 


How does your pastor interpret the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th Seal judgments?  Does he reference the Received Greek Text to determine the nuances of each Greek word and the context of each verse? Or does he simply parrot the false interpretations of prophecy that have been scripted and circulated by the Synagogue of Satan? 

"Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision. For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh." Phil. 3:2-3

Are you a student of God's Word, or do you depend on your pastor or favorite preacher or Bible teacher to teach you the truth?  "God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar." (Rom 3:4)  Instead, allow the Holy Spirit teach you as you read the Bible. "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come." (John 16:13)


God will speak to you as you read His Word, not in audible voice or a vision, but through the "still, small voice" of the Holy Spirit.  Jesus said, "He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him." (John 14:21)


Avail yourself of Bible resourcesconcordances, interlinears, lexiconsto understand the Greek and Hebrew words underlying the English words in their context.  "Study to show yourself approved, a workman that needeth not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." (1 Tim. 2;14)  "Prove all things and hold fast that which is good." (1Thess. 5:21)